|
According to the Department of Fish and Game, the McNeil River
bears range throughout the region, using both the Katmai National
Preserve to the west and areas north of the sanctuary, both of which
allow hunting. AP file photo
By Mary Pemberton, Associated Press
ANCHORAGE - For decades, Larry Aumiller led small groups of
people into the McNeil River State Game Sanctuary to watch as the
largest congregation of brown bears in the world feast on salmon in
the summer.
The former sanctuary manager said he emotionally
couldn't do it any longer after a decision by the Alaska Board of
Game increased opportunities to hunt the bears. Aumiller moved to
Montana.
"To be honest, it was so heartbreaking I just
couldn't be around it," Aumiller said.
If nothing changes,
state lands used by the bears near the 114,400-acre sanctuary in
southwest Alaska will be open to hunting as of July 1, clearing the
way for a fall hunt. Opponents say it's not sporting to hunt the
McNeil River bears, which are accustomed to humans and routinely
come to within 10 or 15 feet of small groups of bear viewers allowed
into the sanctuary each summer. Supporters say the bears are fair
game when they wander outside the sanctuary. The game board, which
is appointed by the governor to regulate hunting in Alaska, voted to
open the state lands to brown bear hunting at the request of
hunters.
McNeil, created by the state 40 years ago, is
arguably the best place in the world to view brown bears. That's
because two things make McNeil exceptional; how close the bears will
safely come to humans and how many there are at the
sanctuary.
As many as 144 individual bears have been observed
at McNeil River with as many as 72 bears observed at one time at the
falls, according to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, a state
agency separate from the game board. However, numbers have declined
significantly since 1998, with 78 individual bears spotted at McNeil
River in 2004 and 87 in 2005 well below the average of 104 going
back to 1983.
The Department of Fish and Game says numbers
now are dipping below the threshold where quality bear viewing may
be affected.
Critics say if hunting increases it is just a
matter of time before one of the recognizable bears the ones that
have been named by staff members over the years is
killed.
There's Teddy. She is so tolerant of humans she will
nurse her cubs just 10 feet from the sanctuary's viewing platform
next to the falls.
"A bear like Teddy is invaluable,"
Aumiller said. "She is so good, so tolerant. In a way, she's worth
10 other bears."
The seven-member game board is being asked
to consider 10 proposals to either reverse its decision or reduce
hunting pressure on the bears when they wander outside the sanctuary
250 miles southwest of Anchorage. The board is expected to take up
the proposals in March. Game Board Chairman Ron Somerville can't
speak for other board members, but offered some of his views on the
sanctuary bears.
While he can understand people getting
emotional over the issue, the sanctuary was created to protect bear
viewing, not individual bears, he said.
"It was never
designed to protect the bears wherever they wandered," said
Somerville, a retired wildlife biologist and administrator with the
Department of Fish and Game. Besides, the state constitution
requires that game be managed for the maximum benefit of Alaskans,
he said. If the McNeil River sanctuary bears were allowed to
undermine that, it would be inexcusable, he said.
The
sanctuary was created four decades ago to protect bear viewing at
the falls. In 1993, the McNeil River State Game Refuge was
established to the north, providing the bears with another buffer of
protection. To the south is Katmai National Park, where no hunting
is allowed.
According to the Department of Fish and Game, the
McNeil River bears range throughout the region, using both the
Katmai National Preserve to the west and areas north of the
sanctuary, both of which allow hunting.
Brown bear harvests
in the area have been well above average since 1998. From July
2002-June 2004, 111 bears were killed, about twice the two-year
harvest average since the sanctuary was created, according to Fish
and Game.
Alaska has an estimated 35,000-45,000 brown
bears.
The Alaska Professional Hunters Association Inc.
proposes keeping the 95,000 acres of state land closed because of
the bad publicity that could result by opening them, said executive
director Bobby Fithian. As it is, the sanctuary bears get great
publicity worldwide, he said.
"From our point of view, the
allocation or opportunity to harvest a minimum number of bears is
not worth the negative feedback," Fithian said.
Another
proposal by bear viewing guide Dave Bachrach in Homer would keep the
state lands closed and restrict the game board from considering
reopening them for at least 10 years.
"Alaska has plenty of
places where brown bears can be hunted without involving lands
surrounding the McNeil River State Game Sanctuary," his proposal
says.
Bachrach said when he flies he can see bear trails
leading from the sanctuary to the state land along the coast. It is
where some of the bears den for the winter.
"Those bears are
world famous. Their numbers appear to be in decline," Bachrach said.
"Until they know why, how can we open the back door and allow
hunters in to kill some more?".
Rod Arno, executive director
of the Alaska Outdoor Council, said his group favors the board's
decision to open the lands to brown bear hunting.
"As long as
these are state lands and a harvest of surplus of brown bears in the
area, the Alaska Outdoor Council would support a regulated harvest
of brown bears," he said. But Arno said there is more to it than
that. There are other reasons besides increased hunting for why
there are fewer bears at McNeil. The bears are going to two other
nearby creeks where there are more salmon and more bears have moved
into the preserve, he said.
Arno disputes the theory that the
McNeil River bears are so used to humans it would be unsporting to
hunt them. Once the bears leave the falls and venture outside the
sanctuary, they are as wily as other bears, he said. "Having guided
there personally, I know that those bears that frequent the McNeil
Falls, once they are away from that site they are just as leery as
any bear that I have guided," he said.
No so, said
Aumiller."We are exposing those bears to a danger that they have not
been allowed to learn exists," he said. "I think that is wrong."
|